(Note: Not long after writing this series, I rejected Hugh Ross's concordist view on Genesis, referenced in several posts. The concordist view essentially argues the early chapters of Genesis are scientifically accurate but stated in ways that made sense to an ancient audience. Ross's science may be accurate, but John Walton's The Lost World of Genesis 1 provides a more satisfactory analysis of the early Genesis passages. July 6, 2023.)
Science and Christianity (Part 1)
Science and Christianity (Part 2)
Science and Christianity (Part 3)
Science and Christianity (Part 4)
Science and Christianity (Part 5)
Science and Christianity (Part 6)
Science and Christianity (Part 7)
Science and Christianity (Part 8)
Science and Christianity (Part 9)
Science and Christianity (Part 10)
Science and Christianity (Part 11)
Science and Christianity (Part 12)
Science and Christianity (Part 13)
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.